View Single Post
  #39  
Old October 1st 03, 02:40 PM
beavith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 17:28:11 GMT, "Jerry Abbott"
wrote:


"Sally" wrote in message
...

"Jerry Abbott" wrote in message news:wD4eb.2747
I mean that White people are my targeted audience, the ones for whom I

am
pleased to work. Naturally, since my work is posted online, it is free

to
anyone with a modem, a computer, and an ISP to examine.


How do you "target" the subject for a particular skin color? What would be
the difference in content if it was intended for folk of African or Asian
descent?
Sally


The science involved doesn't depend on the race of who is learning it. But
the proportion of those in a race who have the ability to learn varies with
the race in question. Racism isn't a philosophy based on discrimination by
skin color. It is a philosophy by which one's racial kinfolk are valued
more highly than foreigners: people who are less related. If you have
children and love them more than you love the children of a stranger, then
you are familiar with the feeling a racist has for his own race.


so.... what about children of a stranger of your own race? where
would this sliding scale end? your family alone?

National Socialism adds an absolute criterion to the relativism of racial
preference: it looks on all the races with a cosmic perspective, as though
it were through God's eyes, and asks itself which people(s) are most able to
achieve higher culture, which people(s) are most likely to evolve toward
higher states of consciousness, which people(s) are most able to look above
the struggle in which all races and species must perforce engage or die, in
order to see the glories that might come to Earth if the right things are
done?


absolute? criterion? cosmic perspective? what the hell are you
talking about?
i've got an idea. next roll of toilet paper you finish, take the tube
and look thru it. tell me what you see. that'd be your "gods" eye
view.
glories?


i'm reminded that the nazis thought nuclear physics was jewish science
and their "gods eye view" cost them the war. thankfully, or at least
i'd thought, their baloney had gone the way of the dodo. forget the
marches in Skokie, i'd never bump into that schissen in an astronomy
newsgroup. silly naive me.

keep spouting this crap. its your right, especially with this being
usenet.

me? i want to throw up.

say, can you rationalize NAMBLA for me too? that's another one that i
have a hard time with....

This information is more than you expressly asked for. I thought that you
might want to know.

If I repair a car that three Whites and a Black are driving it, I do this
service for the three Whites. The Black got my help incidentally, not by
any intention of mine. It is the same with my webpages on celestial
mechanics. I serve my own people. Anyone else who benefits, benefits
serendipitiously.

Jerry Abbott