Thread
:
Highest magnifications
View Single Post
#
8
May 17th 04, 08:41 AM
gswork
external usenet poster
Posts: n/a
Highest magnifications
c (Bill Ferris) wrote in message ...
gswork wrote:
I used the same calculations on nearby stars to fully appreciate why
we just can't see them as disks through telescopes, i roughly
estimated that seeing Sirius A as a disc roughly the size of the moon
would require x300,000 magnification (but i may have that wrong):
Strictly speaking, you'd be magnifying the airy disk to the apparent size of
the Moon. Brian Tung, in his response, brought up a couple of stars with
apparent sizes in the vicinity of 0.05-arcsecond. You'd need a 100-inch
aperture and incomprehensibly perfect seeing to even have a shot at visually
resolving such an object.
Based on the magnification you're applying to Sirius A, it appears you're
assuming an angular size for that star of 0.006-arcsecond. Resolving this star
visually would require a 1,000-inch (25-meter) aperture and...well, you'd need
to be above the atmosphere for seeing that good ;o)
ah well, the 25M reflector on the moon is beyond my budget at the moment!
gswork