View Single Post
  #27  
Old December 24th 03, 03:53 PM
Anthony Cerrato
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Ben Bova SETI Article


"Jason H." wrote in message
om...
"ComputerDoctor" wrote in message

...
Are you saying that humans are going to invent nanobots

that think for
themselves?


Probably.

- when we don't even know ourselves how we think,


We do not need to know how we think, and more importantly,

machines
programs do not need to function like a biological

computer in order
to act in apparently intelligent ways. The Turing test

only requires
the machine to execute logical functions and communicate

them in a way
that is indistinguishable from a human.

or how to write programs without bugs in,


Not every program has 'fatal-error' bugs, and many can

recover
themselves to prior 'safe' states once bugs are detected.

let alone how to write programs that re-program

themselves?

Actually, the program and the hardware to do that are

already in the
Smithsonian Museum. Deep Blue, the famous IBM machine

that beat the
then (1997)world chess champion Gary Kasparov possessed

the ability to
self-write code and the original programmers didn't know

precisely HOW
it beat Kasparov.

Consider visiting the following link


http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/re...deepblue.shtml

Thanx for the link Jason--interesting, I hadn't known that
Deep Blue was actually considered to be "self-programming,"
even in the most limited sense. That quality is certainly a
minimal prerequisite to the building of a true AI--but most
of us I think have always considered that to be still a few
centuries away...along with Asimov's positronic robots!
:-))

"...Since the match five years ago, IBM has proposed a

grand challenge
and is currently working with academia, governments and

other
corporations to address this looming problem posed by the

complexity
of IT infrastructure. Called 'autonomic computing,' this

called for
computers to manage themselves with greater than

human-like abilities
for use across a wide range of business and commercial

applications,
from e-sourcing to data-mining to resource allocation."

Basically they were saying that IT's incredible growth is

out-pacing
the ability of human IT managers to control it, so it is

necessary for
the machines to take over the job. They are using the

'deep blue'
approach to solving this problem. It is already

under-way.

Who is going to test that the nanobots' programs don't

have bugs in?


The machines will.


And they will do a damnsight better job than Microsoft I
believe.
....tonyC


Jason H.