View Single Post
  #7  
Old March 28th 04, 02:31 AM
Allen W. McDonnell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default MESSENGER Launch Rescheduled


Why should mariner 10 in 1973 require 1 Venus flyby to set up 3 Mercury
flyby's and the 2004 Messenger mission require one Earth flyby, 2 Venus
flyby's and 3 Mercury flyby's before it actually goes into orbit in

2011?
Getting to Mercury is less energy intensive than getting to Jupiter.


Are you sure about that? I thought it was more intensive, since you
effectively have to lose all your momentum.

And going into orbit about a body is also more intensive then doing a

flyby.



You don't want to loose all your momentum, that puts you on a collision
course with old Sol himself, you just want to loose the difference in
orbital velocity for the Earth and Mercury, which is about the same energy
wise as a high asteroidal belt orbit or a Jupiter level orbit.

Going into orbit is a lot tougher than just doing a flyby, but we have done
it many times with Venus and Mars and we have suceeded in doing it with
Jupiter once, with Galelio.

Using
'energy saver' orbits is fine so long as you have all the time in the

world,
but NASA has developed the IMO bad habit of selecting the cheapest

orbits
no
matter what the time delay. To get people to vote and fund space

missions
you have to give them pretty pictures to look at. Maybe NASA is smarter
than I think because the way they are doing Messenger they will get a

nice
set of Earth pics and two sets of Venus pics to publish, but Venus and

Earth
are somewhat well known. Mercury is mostly still unknown territory so I
want the mission to get there and start Mercury science while I am still
alive and interested, not 7 years down the road when many things may

have
changed in both my life and the world at large.


True, and consider how the scientists whose jobs depend on this feel.

However, more than pretty pictures, people look at the bottom line and
appear to want cheaper rather than faster.


Bean counters are the same the world over, and if I hear one more time how
we can't afford more money on Space when SSI gets 100 times as much funding
with gross CPI raises every year I think I will puke.

Allen W.