Faulty hardware found on shuttle
"Jorge R. Frank" wrote:
Richard Lamb wrote in
:
But even a Boeing 7^7 is only a pale glimmer of the complexity
involved in designing and building something on the level of
the Orbiter.
Actually, Boeing's modern 7*7 designs are comparable in complexity to the
orbiter. The biggest difference is that modern airliners have several
design generations behind them, so their designers have a pretty good idea
what works and what doesn't.
The orbiter is still essentially a first-generation design. If it's balky
and temperamental, it's mainly because its designers did *not* have a prior
experience base for reusable spacecraft.
--
JRF
Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.
Tell you what, Jorge.
I'll conceed that spacecraft design is comporable to airliner
design - same way my little airplane is comporable to a 747.
Yeah, sorta, give or take a few orders of magnitude.
Richard
|