View Single Post
  #4  
Old February 13th 04, 05:59 AM
Jorge R. Frank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default possible January launch

David Ball wrote in
:

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 23:33:52 GMT, Bruce Palmer
wrote:

I think they're greasing the skids for Hubble's demise because they
won't be in a position to launch the servicing mission in time to save
it. Echoes of Skylab.


Is Hubble that close to de-orbiting or does that assume more equipment
failures aboard Hubble ?

I admit I'm a bit ignorant on the technical details of keeping Hubble
in orbit. Does it require re-fueling or some kind of orbital re-boost
by the Shuttle ?


Hubble has no propulsion systems, and is completely dependent on the
shuttle for reboost.

Hubble is in a relatively high orbit and is not projected to re-enter until
after 2010. Of course, a bad solar maximum like the one in 1979-80 that
brought down Skylab could accelerate that, but not by much.


--
JRF

Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.