View Single Post
  #6  
Old January 30th 04, 02:58 AM
Mitch Alsup
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Unified Force-Energy-Mass Theory of CPH

(Hossein Javadi) wrote in message . com...
Unified Force-Energy-Mass Theory of CPH

In Quantum mechanics and Relativity have been accepted that field and
mass-energy are two separable items.


No, the very basis of reletivity is that:

E = m * c**2

Mass and energy are very intimately related, and when mass gains lots
of kinetic energy (like very close to the speed of light) then it
starts to act like energy (e.g. waves).

But Force, Energy and Mass are
equivalent in Theory of CPH.


Energy and Force equivalent- ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Force exerted over a distance is work, work through time is energy.
Any theory that posits force and energy are hte same is false.

Also in classical physics attractive and
repulsive gravitational force are independence and there is not any
relationship between repulsive gravitational force and the limitation
of speed in universe.


Could you restate this sentence and use words scientists actually
use, so I can try to figure out what is being stated.

In General Relativity gravity replacement by
space-time and gravity is not a fundamental force.


Sort of--gravity is the bending of space time from mass and energy.
A change of this bending will cause gravitational waves to ripple
through space at the speed of light.

But in Theory of
CPH gravity force is a fundamental force and it produces other
fundamental forces.


Is there any evidence backing CPH?
Does CPH make any fundamentally different predictions than GR?
If so, how would one go about trying to measure these differences?

Also repulsive gravitational force and limit of
speed are depending to each other in Theory of CPH.


Sounds quite circular if you ask me.

Also universe
expanding and accelerating universe are result able of limitation of
speed in Theory of CPH. So, Dark Energy is result able of the above
equivalence deduction.


Could you restate this sentence and use words scientists actually
use, so I can try to figure out what is being stated.