Thread
:
Do you believe in such a statement?
View Single Post
#
9
November 29th 03, 05:53 AM
ValeryD
external usenet poster
Posts: n/a
Do you believe in such a statement?
(BllFs6) wrote in message ...
You ASKED about possible accuracy....my answer being that 1/20th wave refractor
wavefronts ARE ALOT easier to obtain than 1/20 wave reflecting wavefronts....
Blll
You forgot some things:
1. Refracting systems has such a factor as internal inhomogeneity,
which hurts wave front too and typically more than for 1/20 wave.
2. For highest wave front accuracy one should use highest rate glasses.
They are expensive regardless of country they were melted.
3. Refracting systems contains sveral surfaces - in any case 2x more,
then reflecting systems.
4. Reflecting systems can be made of zero-expansion substrate - this helps
a lot in manufacturing and testing - and such in reaching necessary
precision. in the same time glasses for objectives has rather large TEC
and very often _different_ TEC.
So, your statement is at least very questionable. But BO's statement about
their objectives quality on 1/20 wave level even more questionable.
We even don't know what the test method(s) was (were) used to prove such
precision.
V.D.
ValeryD