In article , says...

On 5/19/20 11:46 PM, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article , says...

you are wrong on that. We dislike bureaucracy of "respected"
journals.
The next logical step is a live public demonstration and the selling of
working prototypes.

Reading between the lines, I read that you think no respected journal
would publish your paper.

many companies like NASA and SpaceX and Blue Origin can then start to
adapt PNN motors to space probes as a starting point.

Sure, if you prove it actually works in space. Again, extraordinary
claims require extraordinary evidence.

you are a stalker.


You are posting to a public forum making extraordinary claims without
the extraordinary evidence to back them up. I'm merely publicly
replying to your posts pointing out this fact. I fail to see how that
is stalking. It's more like we're exchanging some admittedly harsh
words on the town square for all to see.

Furthermore, I'm trying my best not to resort to personal attacks. I'm
pointing out that random people claim to have invented reactionless
drives all the time. So far, none of them have been found to violate
the known laws of physics and therefore none of them actually work.
It's up to you to prove to the world that yours actually works.

I actually hope you succeed, but remain highly skeptical, as I am of all
similar claims.

Jeff
--
All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone.
These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends,
employer, or any organization that I am a member of.