On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 at 1:08:47 PM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On 5/19/20 6:27 PM, Dean Markley wrote:
On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 at 11:32:19 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On 5/19/20 4:39 PM, Dean Markley wrote:
On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 at 8:52:20 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On 5/19/20 2:03 PM, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article , says...

On 5/18/20 10:53 PM, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote:
"Doctor Who"Â* wrote in message ...

the only response about this is that you don't know how physics
really
works. You only know what you have read in books, but you have never
done a physics experiment yourself.


Far from it, I've done quite a few.


prove it.



Greg is not claiming anything extraordinary. Lots of people have done
physics experiments. So there is no valid reason to question this.

You're the ones making the extraordinary claims (essentially having
discovered a reactionless drive that violates the currently known laws
of physics).

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. So far, you have a
website and some pictures of an experimental setup. The next logical
step is a peer reviewed paper. Let us know when that's been peer
reviewed and published in a respected physics journal.

Jeff



you are wrong on that. We dislike bureaucracy of "respected" journals.
The next logical step is a live public demonstration and the selling of
working prototypes.

many companies like NASA and SpaceX and Blue Origin can then start to
adapt PNN motors to space probes as a starting point.

You "dislike" the bureaucracy? That's a clear indicator that you have nothing. You are making excuses now.



we have to bypass the "peer review" criminals. While we wait for
judgement by a "respected" journal they copy pnn and republish it under
another name.

And you think using a pseudonym like "Dr Who" advances your case? You are a troll.




**** Off.

Case proved