RichA wrote in
:

On Sunday, 20 January 2019 00:57:13 UTC-5, Chris L Peterson
wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 19:35:06 -0800 (PST), RichA
wrote:

On Saturday, 19 January 2019 09:39:03 UTC-5, Chris L Peterson
wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 19:51:31 -0800 (PST), RichA
wrote:

On Friday, 18 January 2019 12:24:33 UTC-5, Chris L Peterson
wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 09:00:46 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili
Kujisalimis
ha
wrote:

We don't need to sacrifice investment in scientific
infrastructure to build carbon sequestration systems
and other systems to minimize the impact of global
warming.

Only if there's enough money to do both. People smarter
than you (
and
who isn't, you being a Chris and all) are skeptical
that's the cas
e.

There is enough money for both, especially when you
factor in the trillions of dollars of cost incurred by
global warming.

Cold killed 5 million people last year.

Clueless.

Warmth saves lives, cold kills. Warmer environments increase
numbers an
d diversity of life. The fossil record shows it, current
tropical areas prove it. There is NO benefit in keeping the
planet cold. The entire northern hemisphere from 35 deg up is
only survivable because of human control of energy.

In fact, nobody actually knows if more people die from warm or
cold conditions.

LIAR. Cold kills millions that might not have died otherwise.
I'm not talking about healthy individuals who happened to stray
into a wilderness and froze to death (although that happens a
lot more than dying on a Hawaiian beach) but people whose
conditions pre-dispose them to vulnerability to cold.
Everything is worse in cold, including epidemics.

Do you have a source for that claim? Or are you talking out of your
ass as usual?

Thought so.

--
Terry Austin

"Terry Austin: like the polio vaccine, only with more asshole."
-- David Bilek

Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.