On Saturday, January 19, 2019 at 2:39:03 PM UTC, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 19:51:31 -0800 (PST), RichA
wrote:

On Friday, 18 January 2019 12:24:33 UTC-5, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 09:00:46 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha
wrote:

We don't need to sacrifice investment in scientific
infrastructure to build carbon sequestration systems and other
systems to minimize the impact of global warming.

Only if there's enough money to do both. People smarter than you (and
who isn't, you being a Chris and all) are skeptical that's the case.

There is enough money for both, especially when you factor in the
trillions of dollars of cost incurred by global warming.

Cold killed 5 million people last year.

Clueless.

I see the ghost of wsnell has returned to the forum unless it is some sock puppet trying to imitate him.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/sci.astro.amateur/$20$20Chris$20Peterson$20stroked$20out%7Csort:date/sci.astro.amateur/P-wYICZkq6o/Wrqk6aE3AwAJ


Too many mathematicians pretending to be astronomers these days so even when the partitioning of direct/retrogrades has made it on to the radar for the first time in 500 years, this newsgroup manages to ignore it as usual.