On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:12:44 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel
wrote:

https://video.search.yahoo.com/searc...6&action=click

It's interesting. It doesn't take much research to reveal that the
quality of the science involved is poor- small samples and very little
published support. It's possible, though far from certain, that his
grazing rotation method is an improvement over existing methods when
it comes to grassland health. But his view that this could add enough
grass to sequester sufficient carbon to reduce CO2 levels to
pre-industrial levels is rather thoroughly debunked. He's backed down
on that claim himself. What he's doing may be locally helpful in terms
of land management, but is of minimal value in addressing climate
change.