On Monday, 27 August 2018 05:14:28 UTC+2, RichA wrote:
On Saturday, 25 August 2018 13:02:05 UTC-4, Chris.B wrote:
On Saturday, 25 August 2018 08:09:42 UTC+2, RichA wrote:
On Friday, 24 August 2018 03:44:55 UTC-4, Quadibloc wrote:
On Friday, August 24, 2018 at 12:35:11 AM UTC-6, Chris.B wrote:

"Conquering the galaxy" is a very human viewpoint.
Nobody else is that daft. Nor that sociopathically aggressive.
Nor that badly organized regarding its population control.

It certainly is true that some humans, like Arthur C. Clarke, have pretty much
seen that we ourselves will realize that "conquering the galaxy" is daft long
before we're in a position to take a stab at it.

So you're likely to be right, even though you do not have direct observational
knowledge of what the other clever beings in our galaxy are like.

I would be afraid of an alien species that did not have its own John W. Campbell
to arrange for the publication of countless science fiction stories explaining
just how likely it is that an intelligent, even if technically inferior, species
would find ways to defend its freedom against attack. Aliens who had never
experienced anything like the Vietnam War just might think they could get away
with conquering the Earth, should they feel a reason to do so.

And of course the notion of the first alien species to achieve interstellar
flight wiping out every other nascent civilization in the Universe, as a
precautionary measure against them developing technology and being warlike... is
not an utterly implausible solution to the Fermi Paradox. Where are they?
There's only one they, and they haven't got around to exterminating us... just
yet.

An alien race *could* be paranoid.

John Savard

"We do not colonize, we conquer."
Star Trek, Andromeda alien.

Star Trek does seem to have more than its fair share of good, old-fashioned, warrior races to maintain tension.

Today, the largest economies economically conquer weaker countries instead of attacking them by force. The superpowers make up the world's economic rules and bend the weaker nations to give away their natural resources for mere peanuts.

Letting the largest US earners pay no taxes is an all out nuclear assault on the rest of the world. The only "fallout" comes from the terrorism this automatically generates.

Hopefully Herr von Strumpet will be behind bars long before "he" can actually attack anybody physically. [Other than women he bragged about, of course.]


All Trump did (putting aside salacious trivia that didn't bother Democrats when Bill Clinton did it) was try to put the U.S. back a bit from the FACT the CLINTONS sold 1/3 of America's production of goods to the CHINESE by using horrifically-lopsided trade deals. Yeah, burn him at the stake.

The problem with democracy is the pitiful qualities of those who put themselves forward to play the game of musical chairs on the gravy train. It may still be the most desirable form of government, to date. But it is highly vulnerable to being high-jacked by the tawdry personalities which always frequent the corridors of power.

Trumpet was so utterly loathsome and so transparently corrupt, that it was a full six months before I could actually bring myself to watch him speak his lies on TV.

It was just like watching a loathsome, T-Rex alien from low budget, Hollywood sci-fi movie without a script. It is unfortunate that it is no longer PC to call this slug "a retard." The term just seems so incredibly apt in his case. He totally encapsulates everything I detest about politicians.

The alternative was Clinton. What real choice was the American electorate offered? An extension of the existing [stinking] latrine trench? Or an oversized kid's training potty, badly over-painted in garish orange by its habitual owner.

America effectively rules the world. Yet the world gets no vote. Every American vote for Trumpet is another vote for Putin and Xi. WE still don't get a vote there either. What a way to run a planet! ;-)