View Single Post
  #243  
Old April 30th 18, 04:43 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Chris L Peterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,007
Default Flat Earther and AGW Denier to head nasa into obscurity.

On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:29:06 +0200, Paul Schlyter
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 07:52:47 -0600, Chris L Peterson
wrote:
You should use that argument also on your own usage of the word
agnostic. You are far too eager to say "you are wrong" to anyone
using the word agnostic in a somewhat different sense than you do.


I'm not claiming a single usage. Nor am I saying that people are

wrong
for using different usages.


So then you don't object to my usage of these words?
Atheist = someone who claims there is no god


That is, in fact, empirically incorrect in terms of how the word is
actually used in the wild. You would be hard pressed to find an
atheist who makes that claim.

Agnostic = someone who claims we don't know if there is a God or not


That is a common usage of the term. I only object to the extant that
it's a poor choice of words when that's what you mean, because it has
enough other meanings that your own intent is ambiguous. If you want
to choose a clearer, more accurate word here, use "skeptic".