Thread: Polar astronomy
View Single Post
  #10  
Old March 3rd 18, 08:21 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Gerald Kelleher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,551
Default Polar astronomy

On Friday, March 2, 2018 at 3:41:26 AM UTC, Davoud wrote:
Bill:
Haven't you considered how much your choice to not take the time to
organize your topics into complete subjects that you then explain in a
systematic and through way - hurts your agenda?


Davoud:
He's a troll and his agenda is to reel in people like you. I would say
that he has been splendidly successful at fulfilling his agenda.


palsing:
Also, his knowledge of astronomy is woefully off the tracks...


You missed the point. There is no way to judge what he knows or doesn't
know about astronomy; he's not here for astronomy, he's here for
trolling. If he were an expert on all things astronomical (and he could
be, you know) he would have to conceal that fact. Because he's not here
for astronomy, he's here as a troll.

--
I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that
you will say in your entire life.

usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm


Well that is some piece of kit you have and I see Roland probably give you a deal on one of his celestial sphere mounts -

http://www.primordial-light.com/technique.html


With the rise of celestial sphere software like stellarium, the rise of 'explanations' based on RA/Dec follow suit in an alarming sort of way as the Earth attains a zero degree inclination while the Sun crosses the meridian going North thereby causing the circle of illumination to go vertical on the equinox ! -

https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap170319.html

What to make of such contrived nonsense !.


The RA/Dec clockwork solar system of the 17th century finds its final justification, even though it is an outrigger of the calendar framework, as a pivoting circle of illumination and by any measure that is horrific.