On Saturday, 13 May 2017 15:15:44 UTC+2, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2017 19:24:19 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote:

On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 09:34:38 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Mon, 8 May 2017 23:43:54 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote:

This is a good one. Like some Brit's plan to build $1.5 billion plants to...put C02 on the bottom of the ocean.

Smart. We're going to need inexpensive options like this to help turn
around global warming.

$500 billion is "inexpensive." How about we cut the entire world's foreign aid to the Third World for this?
Also, partial decay of that much plastic would destroy the ocean ecosystems.

$500 billion is peanuts compared to the economic cost of global
warming.

Or just a few hours of the NSA's wage bill while creating WannaCry?

Microsoft's philanthropic attitude towards older operating systems has come under scrutiny. They are releasing another security fix for their broken down, heritage operating systems. That Great, Great, Great philanthropist makes most of his free cash from licensing their broken down wares to small businesses and local government. They are always being strapped for cash, by central government to spend on themselves. So the idea of paying to upgrade to windows latest broken down system guarantees years more income for the copycat cough master criminals of the Internet.

Sorry about the length of these sentences. I'm still waiting for Google iGrammar, Google iPunctuation and Google iPrecis to arrive. Hopefully Google iNContext won't arrive first. Just think, in another year or two Trumpet.Great.Great@Twit won't even need to write his own foreign policy tweets. Then where will we all be? ;-)