On Thursday, June 23, 2016 at 2:47:02 PM UTC+1, Chris L Peterson wrote:

You are mistaken. I am quite expert on both the bible, most major
religions, and religious philosophy.


Despite strutting around casting opinions on everything and anything I find many empiricists like yourself wispy in that there is nothing substantial behind the commentaries and certainly nothing original, almost like a cookie cutter individual following a predictive path full of the same ideologies and slogans.

As an innovator, I looked at what Newton did and how he tried to pass off timekeeping as time so there is very little by way of interpretation in spotting he is forcing his own language on the Equation of Time which renders the dual surface rotations in terms of the natural noon cycle to a 24 hour average -

"Absolute time, in astronomy, is distinguished from relative, by the equation of time. For the natural days are truly unequal, though they are commonly considered as equal and used for a measure of time; astronomers correct this inequality for their more accurate deducing of the celestial motions...The necessity of which equation, for determining the times of a phænomenon, is evinced as well from the experiments of the pendulum clock, as by eclipses of the satellites of Jupiter." Principia

Someone like you when faced with the Equation of Time phrased as absolute/relative time can't absorb what is being said as you inherited the voodoo from a century ago which exploits the situation that nobody understood what Isaac was up to.

You are fine, your partner will show up soon enough so you both can embrace each other with one sentence inanities.