On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 09:59:26 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

He is mythical. Good luck finding a scholar who disagrees.

What would be their proof? (Their -opinions- are irrelevant.)

He's mythical by the definition of "mythical". That's not something
you "prove". But you've demonstrated many times that you are clueless
about how scholarly research operates.

To the extent somebody wants to claim he was a real person, the burden
is on them to provide evidence.

You said that he wasn't a real person but a mythical character, so where is YOUR proof.

You don't understand anything about logic, either. If you assert
something is real, you need to offer evidence. Not if you assert
something doesn't exist.