What do conservative policy intellectuals think about climate change?
On Tuesday, April 7, 2015 at 6:45:13 PM UTC+1, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 4/7/15 12:40 PM, oriel36 wrote:
The planet warms every time a location turns into solar radiation within each 24 hours and cools as the stars of the great celestial arena come into view as the planet turns back into the shadow of the Earth.
Every era has a chance to make its presence felt for future generations and the recovery of astronomy falls on our generation at this juncture where even the planet's daily temperature fluctuation comes into play in the most fundamental way in response to a single rotation each 24 hours.
You insist the proportion of rotations to an orbital cycle is 366 1/4 rotations to 1 and contrary to every known experience of a rotation each 24 hours and extended on to February 29th which draws attention to the parent observation which determines the fractional proportion as 365 1/4 rotations to 1 orbital cycle.
I am a supporter of funding even though I don't require it myself but for genuine researchers who see the big picture inherent in undoing the damage created by the 'scientific method' . The Earth is not a greenhouse and it warms and cools in two ways over the course of a annual circuit corresponding to two separate surface rotations to the central Sun. This is the foundation of planetary climate, period !.
|