On Friday, July 18, 2014 11:11:44 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 5:26:18 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:

"If photons do break down, the results of such decay must be even lighter particles, ones that would travel even faster than photons. Assuming photons have mass, "there is only one particle we know from the Standard Model of particle physics that might be even lighter -- the lightest of the three neutrinos," Heeck said.







Neutrinos are ghostly particles that only very rarely interact with normal matter. Countless neutrinos rush through everyone on Earth every day with no effect.







"It might well be that the neutrino is lighter than the photon," Heeck said. In principle, each photon might decay into two of the lightest neutrinos.







"The lightest neutrino, being lighter than light, would then actually travel faster than photons," Heeck said.







The idea of neutrinos that move faster than photons would seem to violate the notion, based on Einstein's theory of relativity, that nothing can travel faster than light. However, this assumption is based on the idea of the photon not having any mass. Einstein's theory of relativity "just states that no particle can travel faster than a massless particle," Heeck said."







http://www.livescience.com/38533-pho...particles.html







I've been saying for years that photons have mass!







Double-A



AA If it goes faster than light begs the question. "Where does it get this extra energy? Also faster than light is not permitted by two of my best theories. TreBert


E = mv^2. The energy remains the same, but with less mass than the photon, it has greater speed.

Double-A