On Thursday, July 17, 2014 8:18:32 AM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote:
On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 5:38:18 PM UTC-7, Siri Crews wrote:

In article ,



Double-A wrote:







http://www.livescience.com/38533-pho...ight-particles.



html







Photons having mass would result in other observables none of which have yet



been observed.







--



:- Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.



'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'



Icke's razor: Given two equally plausible explanations, choose the weirder.



Only entangled photons can represent/create mass.


Every other particle has mass, so why not the photon. I came to that conclusion after reading Feynman's book on QED. As far as quantum properties are concerned, there is nothing special about the photon. Only a matter of degree.

Double-A