On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 4:06:57 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 10:59:03 AM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote:

On Monday, July 14, 2014 3:21:14 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:



On Monday, July 14, 2014 6:20:15 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:







On Saturday, July 12, 2014 2:33:53 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:















"It was only a split-second burst of radio waves, but what a radio telescope in Puerto Rico detected has scientists excited about pulses that seem to be originating in deep space."































































"Just what is causing these bursts though remains a mystery, but possibilities include evaporating black holes, merging neutron stars or flares sent from magnetars, which McGill described as "a type of neutron star with extremely powerful magnetic fields.""































































http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014...what-they-are/































































Double-A































AA I'm bringing in my "Critical Mass Theory" into the QM realm. Its fits there very well indeed. This theory gave the BB its bang. It is now very well accepted .It is reality. TreBert























They say that during inflation space expanded FTL. Problem is we know nothing about the structure of space or how it is driven. We know how force or pressure drive material objects which have mass. But we know nothing about what would drive space to expand, FTL or otherwise. They say the current universe is expanding at an accelerating rate. If this is caused by expansion of space, then what is the need for dark energy? Energy relates to the acceleration of matter. But if objects are being simply carried along with the expansion of space, then energy would not have to be applied to the objects themselves. And how energy would serve to expand space itself, there is no theory.















Double-A







Perhaps the ongoing flows of aether is all there is, and we're simply created within one of many aether flows. As Bert has said so many times, there is an unlimited number of universes, and otherwise as mpc755 keeps telling us about the properties of aether creating all sorts of physics if not the holy grail of our perceived cosmic creation.







After all, something truly weird created atoms, and those immortal atoms are not made of nothing.





Whether you call it space, or aether, or fields, we know little about its actual properties. It may well flow, but we don't really know what is flowing, or what makes it flow. It may be warped, but we don't know the nature of it. If the universe is expanding merely because it is of the nature of space to expand, then what is the need to hypothesis dark energy? Has anybody really thought this through?



Matter and antimatter were said to be formed in the early universe, and then they mostly annihilated each other, but some matter was left over. This is a wrong assumption. Mother nature can balance her books.


Double-A

I've always insisted there is at least one other universe of essentially the exact same mass.