On Thursday, July 3, 2014 11:16:51 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 12:12:53 PM UTC+12, Double-A wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/universe-shoul...220219618.html







Amazing!







Double-A





The cosmos obviously exists. However, space and time as we conceive of it, cannot exist.



How can this be?



Well, the world is very likely to be two dimensional with two extra dimensions (space and time as we know it) arising out of the two dimensional structure.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DIl3Hfh9tY



http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...lly-is-a-holo/



http://www.pma.caltech.edu/~physlab/...can1105-56.pdf

Indeed, space and time making up our perceived 3rd dimension within our otherwise 2D existence.

There's certainly more than sufficient volumetric mass if our universe is only 94 GY diameter, and when it started out as something very small (say less than a couple light years diameter) its concentrated mass of perhaps 5e56 kg (initial m3 of Plank density of supposedly 5e96 kg) as expanding its physical radius at 'c' should have been impossible unless there was an ongoing aether/dark-matter flow inflating our universe (exactly as contributor mpc755 suggested).

I keep having to revise my estimate of the universe mass because, modern physics and science keeps discovering more itsy-bitsy items of mass. Even quantum entangled photons seem capable of representing mass of at least one electron, and as far as anyone knows there's no shortage of photons.