View Single Post
  #8  
Old June 10th 14, 08:39 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,515
Default How the moon was formed

On Sunday, June 8, 2014 5:03:40 PM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in message

...



snip inane AA drivel





*** Says who ??? Is that one of your scientific observations




or have you been plagiarizing GuthBall's regurgitated drivel ...






I state only facts here, Hagar.



Double-A





*** If you can read, read this, you dumpster diving

douche bag:



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_impact_hypothesis



This is from people who get paid for thinking, unlike

you and your free loading ilk ...



From the very article you cited:

"There remain several questions concerning the best current models of the giant impact hypothesis, however.[5] The energy of such a giant impact is predicted to have heated Earth to produce a global 'ocean' of magma; yet there is no evidence of the resultant planetary differentiation of the heavier material sinking into Earth's mantle. At present, there is no self-consistent model that starts with the giant impact event and follows the evolution of the debris into a single moon. Other remaining questions include when the Moon lost its share of volatile elements and why Venus, which also experienced giant impacts during its formation, does not host a similar moon."

Double-A