(Perfectly Innocent) wrote in message . com...
[snip]
I believe that if you think about this carefully, you will see that
Einstein's postulates of Special Relativity work perfectly fine on an
instantaneously created, flat, infinite space but that the Lorentz
transformation is not a natural law for that space. In this universe,
as a consequence of instantaneous creation, there must have existed a
natural initial synchronization for all idealized coordinate clocks in
all frames of reference. t=0 everywhere. I believe that this is a
straightforward counterexample to a false philosophy in relativity
that I was combating recently on another thread.

Eugene Shubert
http://www.everythingimportant.org


Anyone on this list know of Robert Herrmann's work?

http://www.serve.com/herrmann/main.html

[snip]

21. (T - G -T) Monograph M1
Solutions to the "General Grand Unification Problem ," and the
Questions. "How Did Our Universe Come Into Being?" and "Of What is
Empty Space Composed?".

Presented before the Mathematical Association of America at Western
Maryland College, 12 NOV 1994.

This presents the first solution to these Patton and Wheeler questions
as well as the basic question "Is physics legislated by a cosmogony."
These questions, and others, are specifically answered by first
generating a falsifiable cosmogony via mathematical modeling. Since
such a cosmogony is capable of generating universes, not just the one
in which we dwell, and their respective "physics," then the General
Grand Unification model, with certain exceptions, must essentially be
explanatory in its final form for it must predict the behavior of all
natural-systems that reside in each universe. Abstract 1 Also see the
scientific justification and need for a cosmogony.

A U-Cosmology
Robert A. Herrmann Ph. D.
22 JUN 1996. Last revision 31 MAY 2004.
http://www.serve.com/herrmann/pp3.htm

Robert Herrmann's NSP World
The D-World, MA Model, and U-Cosmology
http://creationanswers.net/astron/NSPWORLD.HTM

---

David Buckna