Frederick Shorts wrote in message ...

What do your ongoing antagonism and your unsubstantiated and erroneous
claims have to do with any of the newsgroups to which you've posted
them, Cypherpunk?


And what does yer **** have to do with classical music or any of the other
newsgroups I've crosspoasted to, Tholokook?

About as much as any of yer **** did.




nightingale writes:

1676 Good morning Don :-)

1676 I just skimmed the list you were kind enough to quote for me, and he's
1676 right: most (perhaps even all, hard to tell on some of them when he
1676 doesn't give any context) of it was off topic.

1676 No comment on what he quoted of your posts?

1677 He has the same right as any of us to post what he wants, including
1677 comments and/or complaints about what we post.

1677 I agree, and have told him so before.

Irrelevant, given that the digest isn't restricted to antagonistic
postings, nightingale. Of course, I've said that before. Multiple
times.


Like when, Tholotroll? Let's see some references instead of yer usual avoidance.


Heh. Look how he treats one of the few people here who actually seems
to like him. I guess you don't need to worry about any competition
from nightingale.

She's given references - I think the initial volume of "antagonist's
digest", and reminders since.



461 Trollishness has its uses. Take Dr. David Tholen, who has now firmly
461 fixed in the minds of about 200 people a minor band music composer
461 (Barnes)

On what basis do you call him a minor band music composer, Wehrung?


Prove that he's not, troll.


Serious question in the middle of all this silliness. How would you
prove such a statement? Certainly, his main claim to fame is band
music, even though he has written other things, so clearly he is a
band music composer. The objection must be to calling him "minor".
How would you define minor, what makes a composer great? Is Barnes
minor even in the band music world, or is he considered a minor
composer because he has done so little else?



461 and a minor, early work by a major composer (Transit of Venus
461 march).

On what basis do you call it a minor work, Wehrung?

It's not one of Sousa's better marches - kind of boring actually.



What does yer digest have to do with classical music, Tholokook?


LOL! How ironic, coming from the off-topic king.



73 Your data; not mine. If
73 you were actually interested in having the smallest possible amount of
73 "antagonism" in the newsgroup, the obvious choice is 4 per day, not 35 per
73 day.

What I am interested in is irrelevant, Lockhart; the fact remains that
the antagonism did not stop, contrary to the prediction that some have
made here.


Youz are interested in the irrlevant, Tholoputz? No wonder yer such a kook.
And what does yer interest in the irrelevant have to do with classical
music, Tholotroll?


And your interest is obvious, Freddie :-)