http://www.agoravox.tv/actualites/so...s-sur-la-42396
Etienne Klein: "Et l'espace-temps en physique quantique et l'espace-temps de la relativité générale ne sont pas du tout les mêmes. Et si on veut décrire cette phase qui est en amont de toutes les autres, il faudrait pouvoir avoir une description de l'espace-temps qui réunisse dans le même formalisme les principes quantiques et les principes relativistes. On y travaille. Beaucoup de gens y travaillent."

C'est ça le problème. Tous ces gens savent que l'espace-temps relativiste (basé sur le faux principe de la constance de la vitesse de la lumière) doit être enlevé mais ils ne le feront jamais car ils savent aussi que, après la chirurgie, une question embarrassante sera posée:

http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/con...ent=a909857880
Peter Hayes "The Ideology of Relativity: The Case of the Clock Paradox" : Social Epistemology, Volume 23, Issue 1 January 2009, pages 57-78: "The gatekeepers of professional physics in the universities and research institutes are disinclined to support or employ anyone who raises problems over the elementary inconsistencies of relativity. A winnowing out process has made it very difficult for critics of Einstein to achieve or maintain professional status. Relativists are then able to use the argument of authority to discredit these critics. Were relativists to admit that Einstein may have made a series of elementary logical errors, they would be faced with the embarrassing question of why this had not been noticed earlier. Under these circumstances the marginalisation of antirelativists, unjustified on scientific grounds, is eminently justifiable on grounds of realpolitik. Supporters of relativity theory have protected both the theory and their own reputations by shutting their opponents out of professional discourse."

Pentcho Valev