Compton Scattering is easier to experimentally prove that the
electrons of an atom form a "plane of ecliptic" around the nucleus of
the atom. Yesterday I was posting about a Rutherford scattering
anomalies to prove electron-plane-ecliptic but in that scattering is
used alpha particles. I need the use of photons as a better means of
proving the electron-ecliptic-plane.

Now in Compton scattering and the photoelectric effect we have photons
as the ammunition rather than alpha particles. And I was searching for
anomalies in Compton scattering. There are plenty of anomalies, but I
have not yet found the particular anomaly that is due to the fact that
the electrons of atoms and compounds form a electron-ecliptic-plane
around the nucleus.

So I am pushing forward with other chemistry data that proves the
electrons form a ecliptic plane around the nucleus of the atom. And I
need not look far at all, for the chemistry bonding of ionic,
covalent, and metallic and the Lewis structure helps prove that the
electrons must form a ecliptic plane, very similar to how the planets
form a ecliptic plane around the Sun (Sun equals nucleus).

Now I propose that the Lewis structure can fit chemical bonding so
well, only because it is a planar ecliptic of electrons. But let me go
into details in another post.

P.S. now I had a sneek peek at how many moons Jupiter has compared to
Saturn and we have 67 versus 62. Now the last stable atom on the
periodic table is lead at 82 ( bismuth was found to decay). So, what I
suspect, since the Universe is run by the Maxwell Equations that the
Sun has at least 82 planets in all. So that many of the planets lie in
the Kuiper belt. Now this is contrary to the astronomy conferences a
few years back that wanted to define whether Pluto was a planet or not
a planet. Trouble there was that they did not even have a proper
physics understanding of what gravity was, so they were helpless and
hopeless in even making any definitions of what is or is not a planet.
In the proof that the electrons orbit in a atomic plane of ecliptic, I
am going to use the Sun and planets as an analogy. For although both
the atom and Solar System are similar and both have planes of
ecliptic, the atom is a "perfect plane of ecliptic of electrons"
whereas the Solar System has many defects and nowhere near to
"perfection". But the two follow the same principle idea of a
*Universal Geometry* because both are rooted from the same set of
axioms-- Maxwell Equation. Since the Maxwell Equations have a plane of
ecliptic for electrons with a background of a sphere, then the Solar
System has a plane of ecliptic of planets with a background sphere of
the Oort Cloud.

--

Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill.
Besides, Drexel's Math Forum can demand no fake
names of all posters which reduces or eliminates most spam and hate
spew and search engine bombing. Drexel has done a excellent, simple
and fair author-archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen
here :

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies