Thread
:
A different direction after Challenger loss
View Single Post
#
7
February 19th 13, 04:48 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
Jeff Findley[_2_]
external usenet poster
Posts: 1,388
A different direction after Challenger loss
In article fb24780f-4c50-4ff9-bce6-
,
says...
coud the liquid fly back booster have been intergrated with the ET
making it all reusable'
No, because then it wouldn't be a booster.
The tank and boosters would remain together till they got over the
indian ocean.
Or the shuttle could of flown on top of the booster and ET
The numbers wouldn't work.
Jeff
--
"the perennial claim that hypersonic airbreathing propulsion would
magically make space launch cheaper is nonsense -- LOX is much cheaper
than advanced airbreathing engines, and so are the tanks to put it in
and the extra thrust to carry it." - Henry Spencer
Jeff Findley[_2_]
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Jeff Findley[_2_]
Find all threads started by Jeff Findley[_2_]