"RT" wrote in message
om...
Paul,
It is not my intention to debate anyone concerning the validity of
paranormal phenomena. This as I mentioned before can only be verified
through personal experience. I find it amusing how easy, members of
this news group dismiss the paranormal. Some of you need to re-examine
your motives as well as the myriad amount of documentation out there.
There is a reason they call it metaphysics. It's because the phenomena
cannot be explained by the physics, at least not yet. Personally, I
have been fortunate to have experienced a number of paranormal events
that have left me without doubt that something is bleeding through
into this dimension from the 'other side'. When you have one of those
undeniable experiences you'll have no need for a "double blind".
Until that happens, we'll reserve talk on the subject.

No, I'm sorry... but that is not valid. Personal "experience" (othewise
known as anecdotal evidence) can come through many other channels, including
the mind and one's own desires, fears, phobias, etc. They are NOT acceptable
as "proof" or verification of the paranormal or metaphysical (or ET's for
that matter).

I am not denying that the paranormal exists, I am just denying that personal
experience is acceptable as verification or "proof" that the paranormal
exists.