On 10/30/2012 5:24 PM, Painius wrote:

The other science you need to look at is "plate tectonics". It will
show you that the Arctic basin formed as the land mass broke up and
the newly formed continents began to spread out from each other.

Your soft capture idea also doesn't uncover as to how that moon got
such an extremely thick and paramagnetic basalt crust, especially when
the average crust of Venus probably isn't worth half that of what
Earth has to work with, and our moon offers at least twice and even
three fold what average crust thickness is that of our planet.

The makeup of the surface of the Moon is almost exactly the same as
the makeup of the Earth's crust. That is one reason why the Giant
Impact Hypothesis can be compelling to many scientists. To me, the
similar crust makeups of Earth and Moon, coupled together with the
fact that the Moon has very little iron, and the fact that Earth has
the lion's share of the iron, supports my proposal extremely well.

How does an ocean mass of water that only gradually materialized over
a billion years, which offers only 1 g/cm3 density manage to cause 3+
g/cm3 of fused and extremely tough basalt to sink or morph and leaving
but less than a 5 km crust thickness from the always molten rock
below?

Now that's an excellent question.


Note to Goth: That means that ALL your other questions were stupid.


I've always wondered how the ocean
waters stay above that crust and don't seep down and disappear from
the surface.


Perhaps it is YOU that needs to study plate tectonics.






--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. 变亮
http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg