On Oct 30, 11:48*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Oct 30, 1:44*am, Painius wrote:









On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:23:00 -0400, HVAC wrote:
On 10/24/2012 1:15 PM, wrote:

Please cite ANY example of Bert being correct...Ever.

That is beside the point! Even if he WERE correct, you'd still nosedive
back into the box!

As I previously pointed out...Before you can think outside the box,
first you must know what's in the box already.

How would you know anything at all about it? *You have never once
thought outside the box. *So how would you know?

This 'ready, fire, aim' mentality is ridiculous.

It only seems that way to you. *To me, it's assuredly "ready, aim,
fire". *What seems transposed to you is simply our way of aiming our
imaginations and firing them at mainstream ideas that might have other
and better solutions. *What sounds "kooky" to you is just the
imaginations of people you will never understand because you don't
take any time to really get to know them.

You're always too busy putting on a show to actually be serious about
theoretical, hypothetical and postulatory science.

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh."

Universes both spin and rotate. Electrons both spin and rotate. Its
intrensic *TeBet

That would certainly go nicely towards explaining why so much of our
visible universe has been moving further away, at least as of several
billion years ago, though having no objective way of telling what it's
currently doing.