Harlow Campbell "HVAC" wrote:

hanson wrote:
In any such discussion about the Big Bang theory
which was concocted by "running a time lapse
GEDANKEN scenario" BACK to coordinates 0,0,0,0
which then are/is interpreted to mean that this point
is the ONE original CENTER of the universe.....

... only to read elsewhere that there is NO center in
the universe... or equivalent that the center is
everywhere...

Harlow wrote:
Yes. It has to do with infinities.

hanson wrote:
"infinity/ies" are always used when reality is out of
reach.. be that in the real wiorld or in the gedanken
world of math. Besied the issue above is the
glaring contradiction of copsmologcial theroies
th

hanson wrote:
and that said universe actually expands, without
saying what said space expands into.. and

Harlow wrote:
Space *itself* is expanding.
Into what, is a nonsensical question.

hanson wrote:
ROFL! Your beitsym just fell off & gummed up your works.
You are weaseling &/or parrot what you read somewhere.
Anything that expands does so in its matrix, even space.
So, what is the matrix that space is embedded in, so
that said space can expand in and into?
If that matrix is "Nothing"... then space cannot expand.
If that "Nothing" has properties that allow space to
expand into then what are these "Nothing" properties?

Mahipal Virdy will have further instructions for you, Harlow.

hanson wrote:
... glossing over the issue that all the centers then
expand into each other... to bring the universe back
into the original concept that the universe is static.

Harlow wrote:
Then how did it start? Gawd?

hanson wrote:
To some folks that's the answer... ahahaha...
They are the "lucky" ones.
To me... I DUNNO!... and I like that.
I don't need no Gawd ... the "aw" from/for the
unknown is enough for me... since cosmology is
truly the GREATEST STORY EVER TOLD..
including all of its fantasies, lies and tabulations.
& it is hilarious to boot ...ahahahahanson