Dork Van de faggot is Antinous incarnate.
On Sep 15, 1:37*am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"
wrote:
"Vilas Tamhane" wrote in ...
On Sep 14, 11:48 am, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"
wrote:
"Vilas Tamhane" wrote in ...
On Sep 13, 3:14 pm, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway"
wrote:
The similarity between Dork Van de faggot and Antinous, the rent boy
of the Roman Emperor Hadrian, is quite unmistakable. Just compare
the 20-year-old photograph athttp://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/index.html
withhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinous.
Antinous was stupid enough to get drowned in the Nile, Dork is
stupid enough to claim:
So if T = 5 years and v = 0.8c, then the stay at home twin will
have aged 10 years (2T) while his travelling twin sister will have
aged 6 years (2T/g). -- Dork Van de improper faggot
-- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of
Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
This is how they make calculations. According to traveling twin he
traveled total reduced distance of 4.8 LY. And so his clock will show
elapsed time as 6 years.
According to home twin, other has traveled total distance of 8 LY and
so his clock will show elapsed time as 10 years.
Actually these calculations violate reciprocity of SR. For the
traveling twin, it was home twin who was in uniform motion and it was
he who went away and came back. But for convenience, they forget
nature of relativity and tag the frame of twin who actually
accelerated. This is against SR
==============================================
But don’t you think the improper inert faggot has the same nose as Antinous?
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/index.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinous.
-- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of
Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway
I am not interested in Dirk’s nose. I am interested in his mind and to
my dismay, I found him a very sick person.
--
You want to be the psychiatrist?
The world is full of very sick people. Look at the Arabs attacking
embassies because their prophet was insulted by some movie.
They have a lynch mob mentality and they are fanatics. Dork
is the same, he just has a different fanaticism. Relativity is a
religion to these morons. Dork imagines he’s smart but he’s
hopeless at algebra... as are all these idiots who wanted to get
their name published in a pop science magazine:
*http://androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Muons/Muons.htm
How hard can it be to know the difference between multiplication
and division?
I saw a bumper sticker in an American truck in Pittsburgh once, it
read “God said it, I believe it, that settles it!” It is impossible to
reason with that bigotry, so I take the **** out of Dork’s narcissism
for my own fun while watching you futilely throwing pearls at the
swine and chuckling.
sci.physics.relativity is a freak side show in the physics circus, it
attracts freaks and a few onlookers who find the freaks funny.
There is no reciprocity in SR, never was. Why do you assume
there should be?
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img11.gif
t’A- tB = rAB/(c+v)
and
tB-tA = rAB/(c-v)
Clearly the two time intervals are different for any non-zero v. That’s
actually the end of story, but Einstein goes on and tries some creative
mathematics but the reciprocity in the stationary frame is already lost.
Even if Dork’s 2T were valid he’d be stuck with c+v and c-v in the
stationary frame no matter what the time is for the travelling twin.
And as for Einstein’s creative math, take Dork’s v = 0.8c and your
4.8 light years
t’A-tB = 4.8/1.8 = *2.67 years (for the light)
tB-tA = 4.8/ 0.2 = *24 years (for the light)
Then Einstein sayshttp://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img22.gif,
which is
1/2 [tau (0,0,0,0) + tau(0,0,0,26.67)] = tau(4.8,0,0,2.67)
and nonsense.
Hence, if x' be chosen infinitesimally small,
*http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img23.gif
What? He’s just made the distance 4.8 light years effectively zero!
What happened to
“it is no longer satisfactory when we have to connect in time series of events occurring at different places, or—what comes to the same thing—to evaluate the times of events occurring at places remote from the watch.”
If x' be chosen infinitesimally small then x’ isn’t remote from the watch anymore!
But anyway, don’t you think the faggot Dork’s nose is like Pinocchio's?
Einstein’s certainly is.
The Lord said unto Moses, “All Jews shall have big noses”.
“For velocities greater than that of light our deliberations become meaningless; we shall, however, find in what follows, that the velocity of light in our theory plays the part, physically, of an infinitely great velocity.” – Einstein, who plays the part, physically, of a ranting idiot.
-- This message is brought to you from the keyboard of
Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I did see your argument of c+v and c-v earlier but ignored it as I
thought it a mathematical necessity. With the example given, you have
pointed out correctly that time calculations, made from the stationary
frame, become meaningless since to and fro light travel is not a
compulsion that can be enforced to arrive at time duration.
Right! Different time durations is the end of the story. By the way do
you want to suggest that Dirk is Jew?
|