Le 19/04/12 22:35, eric gisse a écrit :
jacob wrote in
:

See
http://www.eso.org/public/archives/r.../eso1217/eso12
17.pdf and
http://www.eso.org/public/news/eso1217/

No, that's not what the paper says.

Of course not.

You *never* say "This nonsense doesn't exist" in a scientific paper.
You say

"New lower limit established for the existence of FOO"


I cite from the paper:

quote
In conclusion, the observations point to a lack of Galactic DM at the
solar position, contrary to the expectations of all the current models
of Galactic mass distribution.
end quote