On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:26:41 -0700, "Clave"
wrote:

"*" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 06:13:09 GMT, "Irony Alert"
wrote:

"Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 10:04:32 -0700, "Clave"
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message :

"*" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:22:13 -0700, "Clave"
wrote:

"*" wrote in message
.. .

...

And of course, Echelon works a whole lot better with standardized
operating
systems.

Oh, *do* elaborate, please.

Hi poopsie.

Your turn!

Considering Echelon has nothing to do with National Security and
everything
to do with corporate profits, elaboration is really not necessary!

Funny, I didn't think you'd be able to.

Jim


"Facts do not require evidence." - *Lexa


Kooks and evidence are like oil and water.

Facts are facts and need no further evidence of their proof.

Like your inside knowledge of how Echelon works.

The internet (specifically Usenet) is being used for Lockheed's Remote
Neural Monitoring/Mindcontrol Project

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2361987.stm
http://www.heart7.net/perfect-crime.html
http://www.adacomp.net/~mcherney/akwei.html
http://members.tripod.com/~ellis_smith/vwars.html

http://www.datafilter.com/mc/thoughtInference.html


This page deals with what might commonly be called "mind reading." More
specifically and technically it deals with methods by which the thoughts a
person is thinking can be inferred by analyzing physiological data obtained
about that person from any sort of sensor devices. (This inference need not
be 100% effective to be a powerful technique for information gathering from,
and harassment of, a targeted individual. Even a remote heartbeat and
breathing monitor, combined with surveillance cameras, would allow for
thought inferences that would be extremely unnerving to a targeted person.)
Combining such capabilities with techniques and technologies described on
other pages of this site would allow for a "full-duplex" sort of mind
manipulation.


Jim