On Oct 9, 1:36*am, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Oct 8, 5:46 am, PD wrote:

On Oct 8, 12:29 am, Koobee Wublee wrote:
The most two important hypotheses that claim an accelerated expansion
of your universe a

**** *Hubble expansion law

** *z = k r

Where

** *z = red shift
** *k = constant
** *r = distance

Note that this is an empirical law...

Do you have anything else to say besides more bull****?

Why, then, you would have an indication of acceleration of the
universe. Do you see why?

You have totally missed the point as usual. *shrug

This law was never tested especially at such high-z distances. *What
if Hubble’s law is not linear as claimed but goes like the following?

** *z^2 = k^2 r

I already answered this. Then you would have evidence for an
accelerating universe.


At the distance observable within Hubble’s technology, the law seems
to behave in the first order. *However, at distances further out, it
would diverge from the linear model of near field. *The law above fits
the observation without supporting such a ridiculous claim of
accelerated expansion of your universe. *shrug

**** *Chandrasekhar limit

Chandrasekhar fudged this up. *So, in a stroke of a pen, he was able
to stop the mass gain of a companion star cannibalizing on its hapless
neighbor. *Why don’t you worship Chandrasekhar as a god instead?
shrug

****

So, a college physics professor is ignorant of any of these, and
Einstein Dingleberries are as just as stupid and getting dumber as
usual. *What else is new? *sigh and shrug

You got to be nuts to believe in all the assumptions that manifest the
Chandrasekhar limit.

You are out of your mind to dictate how your universe behaves by
believing in the Chandrasekhar limit.