PD wrote in
:

On Oct 8, 12:29*am, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Oct 7, 2:25 pm, PD wrote:

On 10/7/2011 3:53 PM, Koobee Wublee wrote:
The whole business of accelerating expansion of your universe is
believe in the Chandrasekhar limit which itself is made up of
several dubious assumptions.

You're nuts, KW. There's nothing in Hubble's OBSERVATIONAL
MEASUREMENTS that depends on the Chandrasekhar limit at all. It's
just a plot of redshift (measured with diffraction gratings)
against distance (measure
d
with standard candles).

The most two important hypotheses that claim an accelerated expansion
of your universe a

**** *Hubble expansion law

** *z = k r

Where

** *z = red shift
** *k = constant
** *r = distance

Note that this is an empirical law. That is, it is an *observational*
relationship between measured quantities.

It hasn't even been empirically true for 70 years, as the relationship
between distance and redshift is highly nonlinear once one gets into the
far reachers of time and space.

Not that the wublee has any clue about this, or willingness to learn.

[...]