On Oct 5, 6:34*pm, Paul Schlyter wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:38:42 -0400, Yousuf Khan









wrote:
On 04/10/2011 8:43 PM, Rich wrote:
Yousuf *wrote in
m:

On 10/4/2011 12:06 AM, Rich wrote:
Looks like the lesser LHC isn't going to do the job. *This came
about
in a discussion about turning off of the Tevatron.

Nothing can find the Higgs if it doesn't exist.

* * * Yousuf Khan

True, so lets pretend it doesn't?
Why pretend, if it actually doesn't?
* *Yousuf Khan

How do we know that it doesn't if we don't try hard to find it?

How quaint,it is the tendency of diminishing returns,today you talk of
a lights peed limit and chase conceptual rainbows for 100 years and
then they now talk of no limit,it doesn't add substance but exposes an
ideology tethering between confusion and an affliction.

http://www.lassp.cornell.edu/lif****z/diffraction.gif

You would hardly thing that diffraction patterns as beautiful as
quasicrystals had anything to do with astronomy,at least
indirectly,but being an empiricists who decided to mock the geometric
language of astronomy,its methods and insights,you are forced to spend
your time among others who may only keep one step ahead of hating
themselves by hating others.

Information is only as good as the interpreter and the branch of
astronomy based on interpretation is in its infancy or in a dormant
state but there are better times ahead.