On Aug 19, 12:06*am, "Chris.B" wrote:
On Aug 19, 7:38*am, Quadibloc wrote:

Note that items on "ireport.cnn" have not been screened or fact-
checked by CNN, as a pop-up message warns.

Please do not be confused.

Retch has obviously picked up on my challenge to Kelleher to change
the relevant Wiki pages to match his maniacal fantasies. These trolls
want the illusion of public acceptance without any of the
responsibility of proof. Why else would they bulldoze their drivel
onto an unmoderated, pseudo-scientific forum?

It seems obvious that this ireport.cnn website is a colouring-in book
for the mental, walking wounded. Could one publish one's 1500 page
manifesto there? Then go out and execute a large number of teenagers?
Or is it bandwidth limited per user?

You'd certainly know first-hand what a "mental, walking wounded"
retard is all about.

http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”