I am not going to reply to the contents of this post in detail,
as very little of it is pertinent to the argument. Instead I
will summarise what you are doing, and comment on that.

First, you seem to turn every point to your obsessions with
leftism/socialism (you deliberately conflate the two) and gays,
usually ignoring my actual argument. Indeed, I can say that I
have never seen a straight guy as obsessed with gayness as you.

Secondly, you seem to be unaware, or deliberately ignore, that
you are arguing with me, not with leftism in general, which I do
not even represent. You're addressing Michelle Bachmann while
debating Newt Gingrich!

Thirdly, you do correctly diagnose the hypocrisies and
inconsistencies of the Left. But for some reason you are unable
to see anything similar on the Right. This blindness, admittedly
not uncommon in the world of politics, suggests that you read
nothing but right-wing propaganda.

Fourthly, you can not admit that big business is at least as
corrupt as big government, in spite of all the evidence. My
analysis, that you (and other defenders of capitalist ideology)
must in their inmost hearts believe in the flawlessness of the
free market, seems sound.

Last, you seem unwilling to honestly debate. I do not make that
accusation against everyone with whom I disagree, as you could
find from my history. But you seem to be just playing to the
grandstand like a politician. I am not interested in argument
under that condition.

I will add to be fair that there were a few constructive points
in your last post, which I could reply to in a normal fashion.
But given this, it seems absurd to do so right now.

Andrew Usher