"OG" wrote in message
...
On 01/07/2011 17:52, The_Doubter wrote:

"Chris L Peterson" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 07:48:42 -0400, "The_Doubter"
wrote:

They are only looking at the current solar cycle. There could be other
cycles unknown because their periods might be thousands of years, and
one of
those cycles could be causing heating here on this planet.

There very likely are longer cycles of solar output. But they are not
responsible for the current warming trend.

In your opinion of course, but I don't see any evidence supporting this
statement.


So you keep on saying.

You are 'The_Doubter', that's what you are. If you were
"The_Evidence_Examiner" you might be just a little bit more informed about
the evidence.

And what evidence would that be exactly? If you're going to show me graphs
or tables of what XXX scientists say, I'm not convinced. I think "they" are
wrong for promoting such an agenda based on so little CURRENT evidence. And
there's nothing to show me that the testing they use for past evidence is
any accurate.

You know, "they" keep saying that there's no evidence that cell phones cause
cancer. My prediction: watch what happens within the next 20 years
(assuming pitiful man is still here).

BTW, you ever take a look at who FUNDS these so-called climate science
studies? .

And then you might have an informed opinion.

I think somebody else needs to do their homework. A lot of somebody elses.