View Single Post
  #125  
Old March 29th 11, 01:58 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,sci.astro
Eric Gisse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,465
Default Fallacy of Relativistic Doppler Effect

On Mar 28, 3:19*pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Mar 27, 10:57 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:

Koobee Wublee wrote:
It should be very clear at this stage the Doppler shift no matter how
you fudge it to be should agree with the energy transform as described
below.


** *f’ / f = (1 + [v] * [c]) / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2)


Where


** *[v] = Velocity vector between frames of f and f’
** *[c] = Velocity vector of light
** *[] * [] = dot product of two vectors


Its' already been established that you don't know how to derive
anything in relativity. What's the point in going over old ground?


So, the college dropout thinks the equation above is wrong under SR.
shrug


YOU ALREADY AGREED THAT YOUR DERIVATION OF THE DOPPLER EFFECT IS
WRONG, YOU ****ING IDIOT.

[snip rest, unread]