Fallacy of Relativistic Doppler Effect
On Mar 28, 3:19*pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Mar 27, 10:57 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote:
It should be very clear at this stage the Doppler shift no matter how
you fudge it to be should agree with the energy transform as described
below.
** *f’ / f = (1 + [v] * [c]) / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2)
Where
** *[v] = Velocity vector between frames of f and f’
** *[c] = Velocity vector of light
** *[] * [] = dot product of two vectors
Its' already been established that you don't know how to derive
anything in relativity. What's the point in going over old ground?
So, the college dropout thinks the equation above is wrong under SR.
shrug
YOU ALREADY AGREED THAT YOUR DERIVATION OF THE DOPPLER EFFECT IS
WRONG, YOU ****ING IDIOT.
[snip rest, unread]
|