On Mar 28, 9:24*am, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Mar 28, 7:50 am, PD wrote:









On Mar 27, 11:28 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
It should be very clear at this stage the Doppler shift no matter how
you fudge it to be should agree with the energy transform as described
below.

** *f’ / f = (1 + [v] * [c]) / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2)

Where

** *[v] = Velocity vector between frames of f and f’
** *[c] = Velocity vector of light
** *[] * [] = dot product of two vectors

Under the transverse case,

** *f’ / f = 1 / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2)

Where

** *[v] * [c] = 0

This means SR predicts a blue Doppler shift in the transverse
*direction, and that is totally wrong. *shrug

Anyone with half a brain would attempt to execute a graceful
*retreat from that. *shrug

It smells like a bunch of sour ass losers with unsportsmanlike
*conducts. *shrug

The bottom line is that SR does not produce what is observed in
experiments. *Thus, SR is merely garbage. *Just how difficult can
that be? *shrug

So, just to recap, what you are saying is that, in your view, the
Doppler shift should agree with the derivation that YOU produced and
which does NOT agree with experiment, and that on the basis of this
result, relativity should be found fault with.

OK, let’s do a recap. *Are the following equations valid under the
Lorentz transform and SR?

** *f’ / f = (1 + [v] * [c]) / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2)

You were just given the derivation of the Doppler effect and you just
agreed that your derivation is wrong. Yet here we are again.

If you don't know what the symbols mean, just ask. Don't just start
swapping them around and call it a day.

[snip rest, unread]