On Mar 28, 3:53 am, Daryl McCullough wrote:
Koobee Wublee says...

It should be very clear at this stage the Doppler shift no matter how
you fudge it to be should agree with the energy transform as described
below.

** f’ / f = (1 + [v] * [c]) / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2)

Where

** [v] = Velocity vector between frames of f and f’
** [c] = Velocity vector of light
** [] * [] = dot product of two vectors

Under the transverse case,

** f’ / f = 1 / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2)

Where

** [v] * [c] = 0

This means SR predicts a blue Doppler shift in the transverse
direction, and that is totally wrong. shrug

Anyone with half a brain would attempt to execute a graceful
retreat from that. shrug

It smells like a bunch of sour ass losers with unsportsmanlike
conducts. shrug

The bottom line is that SR does not produce what is observed in
experiments. Thus, SR is merely garbage. Just how difficult can
that be? shrug

p_x' = gamma (p_x - Ev/c^2)
p_y' = p_y
p_z' = p_z
E' = gamma (E - p_x v)

Is the transverse Doppler equation not the following?

** E' = gamma (E - p_x v)

Where

** p_x = 0

If yes, WTF is the problem? The transverse Doppler shift under SR is
blue. shrug?

If no, what should the correct equation for transverse Doppler shift
look like according to you?

I don't know why you think that there is some kind of incompatibility.

Is the last equation the same as the following?

** E’ / E = (1 + [v] * [c]) / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2)

Where

** [v] = Velocity vector between frames of f and f’
** [c] = Velocity vector of light
** [] * [] = dot product of two vectors

As yours truly has said, you guys are bunch of sour ass losers.
shrug

The bottom line is that SR is just garbage. shrug