On Mar 27, 11:28*pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Mar 27, 9:01 am, Daryl McCullough wrote:

On Mar 26, Koobee Wublee wrote:
What is the transverse Doppler effect under relativity?
According to the energy transformation and also your derivation,
it should predict a blue shift while experiments time after time
all have indicated red. *Oops! *shrug

This disagreement of SR with experiments is serious and fatal, no?

[So] checkmate

Koobee's problem...

It should be very clear at this stage the Doppler shift no matter how
you fudge it to be should agree with the energy transform as described
below.

So, just to recap, what you are saying is that, in your view, the
Doppler shift should agree with the derivation that YOU produced and
which does NOT agree with experiment, and that on the basis of this
result, relativity should be found fault with.

Aha.

Seto has a similar agenda -- to try to show that relativity says
something which it does not say, so that relativity can be
discredited.

Seto, however, is notoriously stupid, and you have adopted his
tactics.


** *f’ / f = (1 + [v] * [c]) / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2)

Where

** *[v] = Velocity vector between frames of f and f’
** *[c] = Velocity vector of light
** *[] * [] = dot product of two vectors

Under the transverse case,

** *f’ / f = 1 / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2)

Where

** *[v] * [c] = 0

This means SR predicts a blue Doppler shift in the transverse
direction, and that is totally wrong. *shrug

Anyone with half a brain would attempt to execute a graceful retreat
from that. *shrug

It smells like a bunch of sour ass losers with unsportsmanlike
conducts. *shrug

The bottom line is that SR does not produce what is observed in
experiments. *Thus, SR is merely garbage. *Just how difficult can that
be? *shrug