On Mar 26, 2:42*pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Mar 24, 4:50 am, Daryl McCullough wrote:









Phi = kx - wt

To compute w' in a new coordinate
system, you rewrite x and t in terms
of x' and t':

x = gamma (x' + vt')
t = gamma (t' + v/c^2 x')

So in the frame F', we have:

Phi' = gamma k (x'+vt') - gamma w (t'+v/c^2 x')
= gamma (k-vw/c^2) x' - gamma (w-vk) t'

So
k' = gamma (k-vw/c^2)
w' = gamma (w-vk)

To get the nonrelativistic limit, you just
take the limit in which v/c is small, so
gamma is approximately 1, and v/c^2 is approximately
zero. This produces:

k' = k
w' = w-vk

In the Galilean case, there is no shift for *wave-length*
(k = 2pi/L, where L is the wavelength), but there is still
a shift for frequency (w is actually 2pi f, where f is
the frequency).

Yours truly was preparing to ruin a celebration, but the victory dance
never came. *Why? *So, here it is.

Between the constant talking about yourself in 3rd person [yours truly
this, yours truly that] and the constant shrugging I am beginning to
think you are mentally ill as well as stupid.

I'd say you are a narcissist but you refuse to post under your real
name. Which makes you just a coward.


What is the transverse Doppler effect under relativity? *According to
the energy transformation and also your derivation, it should predict
a blue shift while experiments time after time all have indicated
red. *Oops! *shrug

In what way are your arguments credible? It has already been
established that you were COMPLETELY WRONG when discussing your
strawman derivation of the relativistic Doppler effect. What are the
odds you are correct about the transverse Doppler effect?

You are probably making an idiotic error with how the coordinate
systems are arranged. Or something equally stupid, which is par for
the course for you.


This disagreement of SR with experiments is serious and fatal, no?

checkmate

Do you act this smug about things you don't understand in person, or
is this just an internet thing?