View Single Post
  #84  
Old March 24th 11, 05:45 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,sci.astro
Koobee Wublee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default Fallacy of Relativistic Doppler Effect

On Mar 23, 10:33 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:

The guy who can't work a simple problem set in classical mechanics
MUST know what he's talking about!


So, you cannot work a simple problem to save your life. That explains
why you are still a college dropout in your 30’s. shrug

Thus, deriving the
Doppler shift using the method pulled out of his ass by Einstein the
nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar is just plain wrong. Want to try
to weasel your way out of this one again or just stomping on your feet
throwing ****s as cheap shots? Come on, little man. Yours truly
dares you. shrug


The arrogant idiot who hides behind a pseudonym dares you!


Who would that be?

Why don't you shrug a few more times,


shrug

and spout some more of your catchphrases?


What catchphrases? shrug

I'm sure that'll convince someone you are right, instead
of convincing them you are an arrogant, abusive idiot who substitutes
invective for knowledge.

Since you hate everyone you respond to on USENET, why don't you just
take a vacation? That way you won't have to shrug all the time, and
hurl bile at literally every person you talk to.


Please don’t take it out on yours truly. The problem of being a
perpetual college dropout is yours only. Do you not understand that?

In the meantime, the bottom line is that using the same method as what
Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar had done, the
Galilean transform predicts no Doppler shift even for sound waves.
Thus, this method of deriving the Doppler effect is garbage. It only
bedazzles nitwits. Yes, only a nitwit can bedazzle other nitwits.
shrug