On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 16:58:55 GMT, DrPostman
wrote:

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 14:53:56 GMT, (Christopher)
wrote:


Not so, hoagy is putting forward a hypothesis, not a claim, the other
side has to forward a reasoned counter argument, not dismiss
everything out of hand with no counter logical argument or counter
hypothesis.

All of his claims have been totally debunked.
http://www.math.washington.edu/~greenber/DMPyramid.html
http://www.masonicinfo.com/hoagland.htm
http://members.aol.com/garypos2/Hoagland.html
http://www.irupert.com/mars/hoaxland.html
http://www.rense.com/ufo2/remedy.htm
http://www.ufowatchdog.com/hall1.html
http://www.skepticalmind.com/hoagland.html

Want more? I've got lots of them. I have done a bit of
research on him, including going to one of his lectures.

BTW, his resume has been investigated and it seems he has
lied about who he has worked for. People have looked into
his claims of employment and found that he either embellished
or out right lied.

Well your face would look pretty unface like if it had been exposed to
3 billion years of dust blown erosion.

Wow, you've got True Believer Syndrome in a bad way.

Not so, myself and a few friends have just seen his lectures on tape
at a mates house a few weeks back one quite evening, the Moon one is
quite good, and it [the moon] was clearly visable when we left his
house to go home.



Christopher
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Kites rise highest against
the wind - not with it."
Winston Churchill